NEW YORK -- Silicon Valley may think it can build a better car. But should it?
As tech giants like Google and Apple look to automobiles as the next frontier for innovation, they face a looming reality: Cars are a lot harder to manufacture and sell than smartphones.
Industry veterans and critics warn that the auto business is a different animal. It’s fraught with massive costs to erect auto plants, complexities in developing new sales and service systems, and daunting liabilities involved when human lives are at stake.
Automakers recalled a record 64 million vehicles in 2014, shattering the old record of 30.8 million set in 2004.
General Motors has had to pay $ 5.3 billion to cover fines, victim compensation and the recall of millions of vehicles for faulty ignition switches. Toyota paid a $ 1.2 billion fine for failing to report safety defects, and Volkswagen Group has set aside $ 7.3 billion for the potential costs of its emissions scandal.
“I think, like so many Silicon Valley techies, that they believe they are smarter than the world’s automobile business, and that they will do it better,” said Bob Lutz, a retired General Motors vice chairman. “No way.”
He added that tech companies would pay the same high prices for expensive components such as electric car batteries, likely pushing retail prices of their vehicles out of reach for the average driver.
“It will be a huge money loser,” Lutz predicted.
To be sure, Google and Apple have plenty of cash to burn, with about $ 270 billion in the bank combined. But the challenges of the car industry may be steering them to find ways to revolutionize automotive technology without becoming actual automakers.
Mountain View, California-based Alphabet, the new holding company for Google and its affiliated businesses, has spent six years working on cars that can drive without human assistance. But the company says it doesn’t want the responsibility of building the robotic vehicles.
Instead, it plans to make the self-driving system available to automakers that already have factories, dealerships and experience.
“We have enormous respect for the expertise of the automotive industry and how big and complex a job it is to manufacture a vehicle,” company spokeswoman Courtney Hohne said. “We’ll partner with many different companies to bring this technology into the world safely.”
The strategy is consistent with how Google currently operates. It relies on other companies to produce the devices powered by its software. Most smartphones, for example, operate on its Android software. But the company doesn’t make any of the devices.
If its self-driving system makes it to market, the company could license the software for a fee or, perhaps, making it free to use like Android.
That’s because it makes most of its money from ads within their popular online services. If they no longer need to drive, people might spend time in their cars watching videos on Google-owned YouTube or seeking information on Google’s search engine -- both of which show ads.
But licensing their technology won’t insulate it from safety issues. The company potentially could be held liable if one of its self-driving cars goes awry and injures or kills people in an accident.
Apple CEO Tim Cook told an audience this week that the automotive industry is ripe for “massive change,” with new software, electric motors and self-driving capability becoming “much more important, in a huge way.”
But Cook avoided commenting on reports that Apple may be building its own car, according to a video recording of his remarks Monday at a technology conference sponsored by
The Wall Street Journal.
“What we really want, hopefully in the short term, is we’d like people as they enter their car to be able to have an iPhone experience in their car,” he said.
Apple has developed software for automakers called CarPlay, which lets drivers use an iPhone and its voice-activated assistant Siri to operate some electronic controls and entertainment systems.
In a research note, UBS analyst Steven Milunovich cites the $ 2 trillion auto industry as a potential new opportunity at a time when sales of smartphones, tablets and PCs are seeing slower growth globally.
Milunovich noted, however, that cars have significantly lower profit margins than iPhones.
Apple, which makes most of its money from iPhones, reported $ 39.5 billion in net income for its last fiscal year, on total sales of $ 182.8 billion. GM reported only about $ 4 billion in profit for its last fiscal year, on sales of $ 151.1 billion.
Apple outsources manufacturing to contractors in Asia. That may be more difficult to do with cars, said Jack Nerad, an analyst at Kelley Blue Book’s KBB.com.
While an iPhone is complex, with about 1,700 components in an iPhone 6 Plus, it pales in comparison to a vehicle, which has some 10,000 parts.
Sergio Marchionne, CEO of Fiat Chrysler Automobiles, sees a car in Apple’s future, though he doubts they’ll attempt to manufacture it themselves. He welcomes the competition.
“I think that this industry in general needs to open up to disrupters,” Marchionne said in an interview on CNBC Wednesday. “Whether it’s the Google car or the Apple car… it’s going to change the traditional nature of car-making.”
Self-driving technology has also piqued the interest of Uber, the fast-growing Silicon Valley startup that operates a ride-hailing service in cities around the world. Uber said earlier this year that it was partnering with Carnegie Mellon University to research and develop new technologies for mapping, vehicle safety and autonomous driving.
The company hasn’t said whether it hopes to use autonomous technology to replace its thousands of drivers, who work as contractors driving their own cars.
Article Source: www.usatoday.com
* SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA-- The man behind the famous RealDoll, a life-size, realistic sex doll, has set his sights on the next stage in the evolution of humans having sex with inanimate objects.
Matt McMullen, the inventor of RealDoll, has teamed up with a group of AI engineers to create a truly realistic sex doll. So realistic in fact, it will be able to chat with you.
A few years down the road both McMullen and people like Douglas Hines, the head of “True Companion,” a company that makes sex robots, are promising some great leaps forward.
These engineers are hard at work creating dolls that blink and talk back -- robo-females who can respond to questions, analyze your bedroom dirty talk and are essentially as close as humanity has come to robot sex slaves.
The famous “Uncanny Valley” is one of the challenges all realistic sex doll companies face as humans have been found to react with revulsion the more closely a robot resembles a human. How people react to an ultra realistic sex doll is unknown, but one website held a poll that showed at least one in five people (and were going to assume these are male people) would have sex with a robot regardless of how realistic it looked.
Are you one of those one in five?
Welcome to TomoNews, where we animate the most entertaining news on the internets. Come here for an animated look at viral headlines, US news, celebrity gossip, salacious scandals, dumb criminals and much more! Subscribe now for daily news animations that will knock your socks off.
Visit our official website for all the latest, uncensored videos: http://us.tomonews.net
Check out our Android app: http://bit.ly/1rddhCj
Check out our iOS app: http://bit.ly/1gO3z1f
Stay connected with us here:
Twitter @tomonewsus http://www.twitter.com/TomoNewsUS
Instagram @tomonewsus http://instagram.com/tomonewsus